If you’re serious about dividend growth investing — not the flashy “yield-chasing because it feels productive” version, but the disciplined, compounding-machine version — then you eventually run into a hard truth: Anyone can raise a dividend once. Twice? Still easy. Three years? Respectable. Ten straight years? Now we’re talking about durability. The 10-Year Dividend Test isn’t a meme. It’s not a buzzword. It’s a filter — and a surprisingly ruthless one. It’s designed to answer one question: Can this company raise its dividend through multiple economic cycles without breaking character? Because anyone can look brilliant in sunshine. The real test is whether they can keep paying you more when it rains. Let’s build this framework properly. Why Ten Years Matters Ten years is long enough to include stress. In most decades you’ll get: At least one recession scare One market correction Sector rotation Margin compression Interest rate changes Political or regul...
Alright. Let’s talk about something that doesn’t trend on TikTok, doesn’t spark cable-news debates, and doesn’t come with a dopamine hit every five minutes: Capital discipline. Specifically — the kind that shows up in mature companies that commit to growing dividends year after year like it’s a sacred oath. Because behind every “boring” dividend growth stock is a story about management restraint. And restraint is wildly underrated in modern capitalism. Welcome to The Dividend Growth Imperative: Capital Discipline in Mature Enterprises. The Dividend Growth Imperative: Capital Discipline in Mature Enterprises In a market obsessed with moonshots, disruption, and the next AI-fueled hyper-growth narrative, dividend growth investing can feel… unfashionable. No rocket emojis. No “10x in 18 months.” No dramatic earnings call plot twists. Just steady, annual increases. Yawn? Not quite. Because if you look closely, dividend growth isn’t boring. It’s a signal. A flashing neon sign t...